It appears that China's gentle relations are moving transmit with its neighbors however, there are some questions the need to be addressed. First of all we note that every time person is a slight upset with the U.S. On an ethics issue China moves in to develop gentle ties and replace our connection with that country. When a nation wishes to do company at a level, which is unethical by Western standards the United States backs off, but in doing so they leave the door open for China to move in an develop a closer relationship. Good for them right? Well if it is an ethics issues then what does this say about China, their ethics and the Worlds abilities to trust their motives?
Let's take the recent North Korean negotiations over nuclear arms, which were positively development some headway. North Korea was moving transmit towards a more open an honest connection with the United States. Then all of a sudden they flipped and instead opened relationships with China at a great larger level, maybe even using counterfeit Us Dollars as currency in paying off the Debts that North Korea owes to China? Speculation.
Another example is Pakistan, where much of Al Queda lives and the U.S. Special teams are strategically taking out Al Queda strongholds and structure using Predator Drones and hellfire missiles. Pakistan has not helped us in removing these terrorists, although they work slight hard to pretend to, of procedure to their reputation they do have a large people which is somewhat anti-Us and they even had fired on our saving Helicopters there to help assist in the Pakistani Earthquake. Now the Pakistan leader and general says that the U.S. Is crossing the line on "Pakistani Sovereignty." The general has canceled the deal to buy F-16s from the United States and is entering the connection with China to buy and co-build fighter aircraft. Inferior aircraft? Yes, but that is not the point here.
China is also in close relationships with Iran. Has sold them Icbms capable of carrying nuclear warheads over 1295 miles and other more sensitive technologies, which is problematic as well. Sure we have discussed this, but now China liking this deal and customer and seeing for oil to buy to feed its new appetite, blocks Un protection Council resolutions to stop Iranian enrichment of Atomic Bombs?
However, what positively do these nations stand to gain from her connection with China; protection or perceived protection, well positively Iran is getting their monies worth at the Un and North Korean Leader lives another day to taunt the Usa? China wants to continue their increase and new customers for the items they produce together with weapons, but in trade what will these nations sell China? I submit to you that China would like to buy energy assets, oil and raw materials. Is North Korea going to grow ethanol for China? Obviously Iran will sell them oil but North Korea still owes the money in trade deals. What can Pakistan sell them?
We also find China is establishing relationships with Venezuela, Cuba and Mexico. In Cuba they will be drilling for oil and natural gas which are in the same fields underneath the Gulf of Mexico and off the coast of Key West that the United States will not allow companies to drill for. Meanwhile, Mexico is sending the legal aliens to invade our country and send money back to spur on Mexican Growth. Cuba is ready to pass the torch to Castro's Sons and Venezuela does not like the U.S. Anything see a time to come worsening of the problem yet as protestors of illegal aliens pronounce their right to free speech in a nation they do not even belong in on May Day, a Communist Holiday for God Sake, wake up!
It seems China is willing to deal with less than ethical partners and some have even said that China has also dealt in U.S. Counterfeit currency. China also will not allow free speech of the Internet and is believed to be testing Bio-weapons, which complex bird flu on their own peasants. Either China is so hungry for raw materials and worried about economic collapse, currency juggling and is becoming a Pr façade, as civil unrest grows or they themselves need to be judged by the company they're willing to keep. Thus Either the United States needs to go back and start dealing with less than ethical world leaders and adopt a less self-righteousness gentle procedure for a more Machiavellian approach or the United States of America needs to expand its national defense, its borders and troops and allies to a much higher level. If not be prepared to fight the whole friggin world and that means getting tough and doing the unthinkable in the coming decades and I do not mean precision bombs and guided smart ordinance unless it is heavy destructive power. We must have that selection if needed and not be afraid to defend if we fail to win friend and affect people. Not pretty to talk about, okay forget I said it, but don't forget the points here.
This is not taking Anything away from China, as when nations grow very fast sometimes they have to do a slight extra scrambling however, the lengths at which they will go to must be questioned, as some feel they are positively over the border line of ethical political maneuvering on any fronts together with but not slight to; fair and honest dealings at the United Nations, human rights violations and counterfeit currency, to name a few. It is difficult for a nation that deals with honesty and integrity, as well as transparency and businesses, which are forced to deal with a nation, which follows no rules, takes the advantage and cheats against their so-called allies, trading partners and friends. But their maneuvering is fun to watch isn't it, maybe that in itself is transparent? Pretend I did not say or think that, but understand and remember the point of contention these comments are positively eluding too.
I predict that Either China will need to have a war in order to continue the present increase or it will face civil unrest, a bloody and short lived Civil War and an market Revolution all in the next two decades. The problem is if adequate unethical and fanatical regimes get together with the help of China then we may positively be funding a war against the United States of America, even if China herself holds short of participating in directly. Many nations in the past periods have positively sold weapons, munitions and partly bank rolled and funded both sides or all sides.
Am I alarmed by this well, yes and no; Yes because currently China is selling weapons and technology to Iran. China is buying industrialized weapons systems from Israel, which is sharing technology with United States of America. China is buying industrialized weapons systems and fighter planes, nuclear submarines and studying about missile technology from Russia. Iran sponsors international terrorism and is construction nuclear weapons and buying anti-aircraft systems from Russia and God only knows what else. (Bio, torpedoes, nuclear, advice systems, etc.)
Mexico, Venezuela and Cuba are close allies and many illegal immigrants are coming from those countries to the United States. Due to the company ties with China and the fact that we are already a large trading partner of theirs it would be silly for them to assault us directly however, who is to say they don't throw the Americans companies out one day like Castro did and simply say thanks a lot and capture all the assets and technologies and move transmit without us if things were to come to a head and the United States middle-class decided to boycott China or we had to cut trade ties due to their sponsoring of enemies against our nation? Additionally if the United States of America is attacked by international terrorists sponsored by Iran, who is to say how much of the technology used did not come from Russia and China?
Those who are watching the world events unfold and understand the Chinese multigenerational long-term plans for total domination of the world can see the time to come potential eventuality unfolding. If China starts to fall apart we all know from human sense and notice that desperate countries will do desperate things. One query which spurred this quick comment on China was, is that desperate time now; Or, or what? positively or what; Red Flags everywhere, well they were positively popping up in my mind after all it is May Day Today. maybe soon China will force reunification with Taiwan, raise taxes and attempt to use that as transmit propulsion fuel for their growing economy so they can pronounce their theory and this might catch the U.S. In a quagmire. We should not take our eye off that ball at all.
So what's is the U.S. Do? What does the Us need to do right now today on this multi-dimensional chessboard? Well, we need to be bold and stop playing pansy ass games with others who are playing for keeps and are playing with a team of unethical players. We need a 70 hour war with Iran to prove our air superiority and domination in the world and can we need to tell China to stand down and Russia to mind their own business, as we take care of a slight unfinished company in Iran. We need to do this now before additional gentle ties are sought or before Iran creates the media events to unite the air of world against the Western world.
Next we need to allow our oil companies to drill in those areas that are in U.S. Waters off the coasts where Cuba in China are planning to drill. We need to remove Castro from power and make Cuba another Puerto Rico. We must move the Mexican border 300 miles into Mexico and call this a Free Zone under Us Territorial Law, as well as set up lethal virtual fences on the current border.
Since Russian bomber planes have made undetected in two Canadian airspace by flying over the North Pole we need to push for middle and Western Canada to secede and join the United States of America as a territory work on this for a 5-10 year project. We need to open relationships with North Korea and offer to buy ethanol from them if they're willing to make it. If not help them with technologies and grants to sell ethanol to Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Taiwan or Australia. The United States of America has not been aggressive adequate in our overseas gentle relations and we need to start aggressively promoting this. additional our President needs to get out more and meet with world leaders, without being attacked politically every time he goes on a trip, as some liberal group starts a negative Pr media slander event. Our political divide and attacks are a serious nuisance and detriment to the very important World Chess Game and we need to keep our eye on the ball and not divide ourselves.
Anyway some food for view for the coffee shop, your turn to talk now. Meanwhile I am enjoying this new voice activated software and just thinking out loud today, so you may do with this data what you wish, I just cannot turn off my Blue Blood genes or the mind of mine. Reconsider all this in 2006.
China polite policy Leaves Some QuestionsThere are some stark days ahead for the United States and the Bush administration in its efforts to stop the Islamic Republic of Iran from developing nuclear weapons. There is an intrinsic need to deal with Iran which is in the process of construction a nuclear reactor and enriching uranium that it says would be used for its vigor needs. Now we see that this nation has been thrust upon the world stage and is now at the town of international consider about its nuclear ambitions. Therefore, it is only logical that we should take a look at either this fanatical Shiite state should be allowed to possess such technology. Does a land that is sitting on a sea of oil unquestionably have vigor needs that could not be met by its huge sustain of crude? Would it be wise to trust the nation that launched the present wave of terror straight through out the world in 1979 with a nuclear arsenal? Can we continue to work closely with any nation such as Russia that would help Iran to perform this goal? These are questions that must be answered.
During the past months, we have seen the Bush administration development some advances toward Iran to seek to offer them some alternatives to construction the bomb. There are many reasons stated why America would want to offer such carrots to Iran. One guess is that America has to show it's wimpiest "Allies" that we are ready to offer cooperation with them and to renew alliances that were strained by the war in Iraq. We will offer olive branches to Iran with an exertion to appease them while Russia presses ahead in its provision of nuclear fuel to Iran. The Bush administration must also have leverage that it would be able to lay on the table when Iran baulks at such offers so that it can get a resolution to the safety Council of the Un. It is my opinion that the Un has nothing to say about anyone about any subject, but these are the moves that must be made towards war in a world in love with the fantasy of peace. In addition, America has to buy time to get Iraq somewhat stabilized so that we can have the soldiery ready for round three in the war on terror. Finally, there is a growing movement of revolutionary fervor construction in Iran for real freedom. They are not crying out for "Western" style freedom. For, no nation on the face of the Earth has a copyright of the cravings of freedom in the heart of man. So, there is no room for a breather. There is no way to take a vacation. There is no alternative to taking these evil men from power so that we can keep the world safe for civilization! Let all these maneuvers come as they must, but rest assured, even now, that the halls of the various offices of strategy in the United States preparations for war with the Tehran Terrorist regime are being drawn up as we speak. If not, then we are all in big trouble, because there can be no victory in the war on terror without taking out the main sponsors of the war.
The government of Iran must be removed. Just look at what Iran has produced in the world since its founding as the first major terrorist government in the world in 1979. Fundamentally, Iran's ideological doctrine, its strategic goals and its political craving to operate the Middle East have not changed since Khomeini's ascent to power in 1979. In short, Iran has employed terrorism as its weapon of option since the beginning of the revolutionary Islamic regime to perform these aims. Terrorism is a State sponsored weapon of Iranian foreign policy.
Yael Shahar, Ict Researcher the History of Iranian Sponsored Terrorism wrote,
Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran, terrorism has served the regime of the ayatollahs as a tool of both domestic and foreign policy. This course was directed against Iranian citizens inside Iran, as well as against advocates of opposition views in exile. Iran's sponsorship of terrorism has bridged ideological gaps and political divides; Teheran has provided arms and training to such groups as the Gama'a al-Islamiyah, the Egyptian al-Jihad, and the Algerian G.I.A. Al-Qaeda too, has benefited from Iranian sustain and expertise for more than a decade. More recently, this sustain has taken the form of free tube for al-Qaeda activists seeking to design a foothold in Lebanon. There are also signs that al-Qaeda has sought the help of Iran in deepening it involvement in Palestinian terrorism against Israel.
The triumph of the Iranian revolution in February 1979 kindled a burst of radical actions by Iran that only merit the title terrorism. These consist of kidnappings sanctioned and sponsored by the government itself, such as the taking of American hostages in the first years of the revolution, and reputed Iranian sustain for and suspected direct involvement in Hezbollah operations in Lebanon, including the bombings of U.S. Installations and hostage-taking throughout the 1980s. The Us agency of State's article "Patterns of Global Terrorism: 1997," released in April 1998, states that "notwithstanding some conciliatory statements in the months after President Khatami's inauguration in August 1997, Iran remains the most active state sponsor of terrorism. There is no evidence that Iranian course has changed, and Iran continues both to contribute necessary sustain to terrorist organizations and to assassinate dissidents abroad."
During the Iran-Iraq War, Iran pursued a strategy of maritime terror, using unmarked gunboats and floating mines to attack noncombatant shipping. Numerous assassinations of enemies abroad in the late 1980s and 1990s were widely and persuasively attributed to Iranian lawful sponsorship, and Iran was accused of sponsoring operations by other militant organizations, such as the Argentinean bombings of 1992 and 1994 and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, attributed to Hezbollah organizations in Lebanon and Saudi Arabia. Iran is currently suspected of supporting terrorist acts against Israel straight through its sustain of radical Palestinian factions.
We may never have all the facts about many of the terrorist incidents of which Iran is accused. Assuming, however, that the following conference of Iran's article on terrorism and the main driving soldiery of that article are at least approximately accurate, unavoidable conclusions can be drawn about Iranian course on terrorism, the direction in which it is headed today, and inherent U.S. Responses.
Iran remains the ideological town of the America-hatred pervading the Islamic Middle East. That theocracy began warring with America when its rulers took 52 Americans hostage in 1979. Highlights of Iran's terrorism on Americans consist of the bombing and murder of 241 Marines in Beirut in 1983 and the killing of 19 Us servicemen bombed at Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996.
More recently, Iran is known to harbor Al Qaeda operatives who orchestrated the bombing of a Western residential compound in Saudi Arabia in 1993 that killed nine Americans. Iran sends Islamic agitators and militants into both Us-controlled Iraq and Afghanistan, and sponsors such terrorist groups as Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Lebanon, Israel, Gaza and the West Bank.
In January 2002, Israel confiscated 50 tons of weapons to the terrorist Palestinian Authority from a ship from Iran. A month before this, former Iranian "President" Hashemi Rafsanjani stated publicly that when the Islamic world has nuclear weapons "The strategy of the West will hit a dead end, since a single atomic bomb has the power to fully destroy Israel." Is not this one quotation from the actual president of Iran enough to do all things needed to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear arsenal? In 1993 an Iranian opposition group discovered other secret nuclear premise in Natanz, unquestionably part of Iran's advanced nuclear weapons program.
It is unavoidable that Iran is the root of Islamic terrorism. Only in destroying this country's theocracy could we ultimately contend a major victory in the war on terrorists. Meanwhile, the Iranian rebels fight to design a government that that will be secular in nature but Islamic in principle. They desire free speech nationwide general strikes have been held in the country with the hope of bringing about the end for their ruling mullahs and ayatollahs. It is apparent that the time is ripe for the Bush administration to topple this regime. Bush stated in his State of the Union Address that "America stands squarely by their side." The time will come when he will have to make that literal. As long as the Iran of today continues, the war on Terror will never end. Furthermore, if this terrorist regime is allowed to possess a nuclear bomb there will be a very good opportunity the war on terror will be lost.
These are just a few facts that recite that the next war has to be with Iran. Though the dangers now revolving nearby North Korea are explosive indeed, the most pressing area of concern on the globe is Iran. Fear is a lullaby that puts us fatally fast to sleep. America may well be playing the song and dance but there is every indication that war in the land of fanatical Shiites is looming on the horizon. It is Ok to dance with a mild bad dancer. Stepped on toes can be mended but it is a fatal mistake to dance with man who holds a knife to your back. Ambassador Thomas McNamara, U.S. Coordinator for Counter-terrorism has stated that, "Our qoute is not with Islam," he said. "It is with those who use violence and terror to strengthen their political objectives." It is clear that Ambassador McNamara is short sighted in these words. Radical Islam is all about terrorism as its weapon of control. There can be no compromising with those in Islam who have caused that religion to mutate into a cultish brood of blood-thirsty vermin. There is no alternative to removing them. There is no room for fear or fatigue. There will be no peace until all the terror-supporting nations have been routed and destroyed. America is wise to make sure that all its assets are in place. Yet, if America allows Iran to possess nuclear weapons then it will face the same writing on the wall that a biblical king of Persia, (Iran), once faced which spelled his demise. It read, "You have been measured with scales and been found wanting!" President Bush's toughest task is not in mustering up the courage to do what is needed. He has already demonstrated that he is up to that task. His task will be to bring a sick, perverse, weak, trembling world along with him. For this war will examine international sustain in a way that was never needed in Iraq. Does the west love its freedom? Is America willing to take the measures that without which will render the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq useless? I predict we will take out this rogue regime and the world and America will be far great for it. For the absence of war does not equal peace. Refusal of war will most absolutely spell defeat!
Iran - The Root Of World Wide Terror